Initially I’d assumed Stevenson’s The Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde would not qualify as a work of realism due to the supernatural elements that make Mr. Hyde possible. However, the Broadview explanation of Victorian Realism gives the novel a strong case for consideration in the category of realism.
To begin with, stories classified as realism are “typically viewed from a single narrative perspective, whether that of the novel’s protagonist or of an omniscient narrator.” In this case, the single narrative is that of Mr. Utterson’s experiences with Dr. Jekyll and in a wider sense, Dr. Jekyll’s attempt to purify the essences that make up the “dual nature” of humanity.
Various quotes provided by the Broadview text emphasize and reiterate the idea that realism should “…present an objective representation of real life that reflects the habits, desires, and aspirations of readers,” as well as document the “…every day experience, moral progress, and inner struggles of an ordinary individual.” Even the seemingly unrelatable Dr.Jekyll’s desire’s aren’t entirely outlandish given that he lives in a society which values a certain standard of behavior and finds himself greatly pained to discover that he lies outside of that societal ideal. Many readers in Victorian times may have felt the same way, as the rigid social structures and suppression of self expression often took a toll on mental stability. It is not unreasonable to assume that readers within said society would also find themselves wishing they could also change or purge that which doesn’t fit into their perceived ideals.
The Broadview text also states that Realism contains “detailed descriptions of landscapes, city streets, and domestic interiors…” of which Stevenson’s story has plenty. Even the introduction of the story contains a detailed description of the city streets: “The street was small and what is called quiet…the shop fronts stood along that thoroughfare with an air of invitation, like rows of smiling saleswomen. Even on Sunday, when it veiled its more florid charms and lay comparatively empty of passage, the street shone out in contrast to its dingy neighbourhood, like a fire in a forest; and with its freshly painted shutters, well-polished brasses, and general cleanliness and gaiety of note, instantly caught and pleased the eye of the passenger.” Interiors are generally described in detail as well, most notably the knick knacks and furnishings of various rooms that might denote status.
A big point against the story’s qualification as realism, is that realism does not describe “what never happened nor is likely to happen.” As such, it appears that the supernaturally created Mr. Hyde is disqualifying. However, the twist about Mr. Hyde isn’t revealed until the end pages of the story and until that point, modern readers would have read the text as a mystery rather than immediately recognizing the supernatural elements. The potion itself isn’t waved away as a course of magic, but rather as a scientific concoction unrevealed for the greater good of man. Even the reaction to witnessing something so horribly supernatural in a more or less “rational” world was fairly realistic, as Lanyon was unable to come to terms with what he’d witnessed during the transformation of Hyde into Jekyll. Finally, the Broadview text itself gives several examples of supernatural elements in Victorian realism, stating that “The persistence of romantic elements in Victorian realist novels not only unsettles the confidence of our formal definitions, but also prompts us to consider just whose versions of “the real” were recognized as the most truthful.” So with that being said, I think the story attempts to accurately and realistically portray the times, and its minor paranormal additions should not immediately be grounds for disqualification in this definition.